Talk:Argument from the second law of thermodynamics

From Religions Wiki
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Arguments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arguments on IronChariots. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Discussions-icon.png

This page has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.

B

This page has been rated as Low importance on the project's importance scale.

Low

This should be merged into Thermodynamics. --Arensb 08:43, 5 June 2010 (CDT)

response to creationists[edit]

since this argument is nonsense, i propose a sort of tongue in cheek nonsense response; something along the lines of "yeah, well creationism breaks the third!". Daemonowner

The 2LoT argument may be bogus, but it's regularly brought up by people who simply don't know any better. So IMHO a snarky response is uncalled for. --Arensb 11:23, 3 October 2010 (CDT)

i see your point, perhaps you could use it for amusement but then go ahead to debunk it. Daemonowner