Argument from Intimidation: Difference between revisions
From Religions Wiki
m (The "overview" section contained too little to be necessary) |
Kyle Youmans (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Merge|Argumentum verbosium}} | |||
'''Argument from intimidation''' (related to [[argumentum verbosium]]) is the attempt to circumvent logic by questioning an opponent's character using his or her argument. | '''Argument from intimidation''' (related to [[argumentum verbosium]]) is the attempt to circumvent logic by questioning an opponent's character using his or her argument. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:33, 29 May 2014
It has been suggested that this article be merged with Argumentum verbosium
Argument from intimidation (related to argumentum verbosium) is the attempt to circumvent logic by questioning an opponent's character using his or her argument.
Example[edit]
- "Only the immoral can fail to see that Candidate X’s argument is false."
Candidate X's argument is deemed false only by asserting that he or she is immoral.