Category:Arguments for belief: Difference between revisions

From Religions Wiki
(1 Peter 3:15 wins the argument if they have no reason.)
(Better fit in the context. 1 Peter 3:15)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[:Category:Arguments for belief|Arguments for belief]] refers to those arguments which, instead of attempting to prove the existence of God, simply attempt to justify belief. Typically this is done by either assuming that belief in God is justified a priori or as the result of a risk/reward analysis. But they do have a moral obligation under {{Bible| 1 Peter 3:15}} to give you a reason for their belief.
[[:Category:Arguments for belief|Arguments for belief]] refers to those arguments which, instead of attempting to prove the existence of God, simply attempt to justify belief, which they cannot do under {{Bible| 1 Peter 3:15}}. Typically this is done by either assuming that belief in God is justified a priori or as the result of a risk/reward analysis.


[[Category: Arguments for the existence of God]]
[[Category: Arguments for the existence of God]]

Revision as of 05:15, 15 May 2009

Arguments for belief refers to those arguments which, instead of attempting to prove the existence of God, simply attempt to justify belief, which they cannot do under 1 Peter 3:15 Bible-icon.png. Typically this is done by either assuming that belief in God is justified a priori or as the result of a risk/reward analysis.