Editing Morality

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

Contributing to Religions Wiki requires agreement with the privacy policy. Please review it before posting.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 48: Line 48:
 
It is unclear that God can establish an absolute morality, since apologists have not established any such ability. [[Divine command theory]] is sometimes mentioned, but this is just [[begging the question]] that God can do this. It seems like God's opinion on morality is just as valid as a human's view (or [[Satan]]'s). <ref name="nonsense">[https://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/six-reasons-why-objective-morality-is-nonsense/]</ref>
 
It is unclear that God can establish an absolute morality, since apologists have not established any such ability. [[Divine command theory]] is sometimes mentioned, but this is just [[begging the question]] that God can do this. It seems like God's opinion on morality is just as valid as a human's view (or [[Satan]]'s). <ref name="nonsense">[https://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/six-reasons-why-objective-morality-is-nonsense/]</ref>
  
The [[Yahweh|Abrahamic God]] is a bad choice for the foundation of morality because [[God commanded atrocities in the Old Testament]], fails to address the [[problem of evil]] and his own [[Argument from poor design|poor designs]], [[Problem of Hell|continues to allow hell to exist]] and is generally [[The scriptural God is unworthy of worship|unworthy]] of being a moral arbiter. Most humans are more moral than this God.
+
The [[Yahweh|Abrahamic God]] is a bad choice for the foundation of morality because [[God commanded atrocities in the Old Testament]], fails to address the [[problem of evil]] and his own [[Argument from poor design|poor designs]] and is generally [[The scriptural God is unworthy of worship|unworthy]] of being a moral arbiter.
  
 
It is ironic that theists who claim that morality is absolute often disagree among themselves about what morality actually entails. If absolute morality was true and was knowable, we would expect most or all theists to agree. Since they don't, it raises some serious questions as to the knowability of morality. If absolute morality is not knowable by humans, what good is it? This view is known as [[moral non-cognitivism]].
 
It is ironic that theists who claim that morality is absolute often disagree among themselves about what morality actually entails. If absolute morality was true and was knowable, we would expect most or all theists to agree. Since they don't, it raises some serious questions as to the knowability of morality. If absolute morality is not knowable by humans, what good is it? This view is known as [[moral non-cognitivism]].

Please note that all contributions to Religions Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 (see Religions Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

I am over 13 years of age and I have read, understood and agree to be bound by the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)