Editing Morality
From Religions Wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[Ethical cognitivism]] - moral statements are factual propositions that can be either true or false. | * [[Ethical cognitivism]] - moral statements are factual propositions that can be either true or false. | ||
** [[Moral realism]] - moral propositions are true or false independently of peoples' perceptions or beliefs. Some moral propositions are true. | ** [[Moral realism]] - moral propositions are true or false independently of peoples' perceptions or beliefs. Some moral propositions are true. | ||
*** [[Deontological morality]] - morality is primarily a set of laws or duties. Some deontological theories allow exceptions | *** [[Deontological morality]] - morality is primarily a set of laws or duties. Some deontological theories allow exceptions based the consequences of actions.<ref>[http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Deontological_ethics#Deontology_and_moral_absolutism]</ref> | ||
**** [[Absolute morality]] - certain actions are always right or wrong, irrespective of their consequences. | **** [[Absolute morality]] - certain actions are always right or wrong, irrespective of their consequences. | ||
***** [[Categorical imperative]] (Kantianism) | ***** [[Categorical imperative]] (Kantianism) | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
**** Egoism - actions should follow one's own self-interest. | **** Egoism - actions should follow one's own self-interest. | ||
*** [[Virtue ethics]] - morality depends on having certain virtues or moral character. | *** [[Virtue ethics]] - morality depends on having certain virtues or moral character. | ||
** [[Moral relativism]] - moral | ** [[Moral relativism]] - moral statements are true or false only from a particular perspective, such as a culture or time period. | ||
*** Individualistic subjectivism - moral statements are true or false depending on an individual's beliefs. | *** Individualistic subjectivism - moral statements are true or false depending on an individual's beliefs. | ||
** Moral error theory - all moral propositions are false. | ** Moral error theory - all moral propositions are false. | ||
Line 111: | Line 110: | ||
==Absolute grounding requires God?== | ==Absolute grounding requires God?== | ||
{{main article| | {{main article|Moral argument}} | ||
Craig claims that if God does not exist, there is no ground for absolute moral duties because there is no moral lawgiver. The implication being that a lawgiver could provide that ground. But this is false, lawgivers are still subjective beings and their presence doesn't guarantee moral objectivity. Even if a divine lawgiver required certain duties of us, all that would be necessarily true is that it required certain duties of us. It would not follow that the certain duties were therefore absolutely good or objectively grounded (i.e. [[Is-ought argument against divine obedience]]). | Craig claims that if God does not exist, there is no ground for absolute moral duties because there is no moral lawgiver. The implication being that a lawgiver could provide that ground. But this is false, lawgivers are still subjective beings and their presence doesn't guarantee moral objectivity. Even if a divine lawgiver required certain duties of us, all that would be necessarily true is that it required certain duties of us. It would not follow that the certain duties were therefore absolutely good or objectively grounded (i.e. [[Is-ought argument against divine obedience]]). | ||