Mutually-contradictory apologetics

From Religions Wiki
Revision as of 14:04, 11 February 2011 by Arensb (talk | contribs) (First draft)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Many claims are made about God and how he operates, about faith, and religion in general. Some of these apologetics are mutually contradictory.

Examples

Perhaps the most famous set of mutually contradictory claims about God is:

  • God is omniscient.
  • God is omnipotent.
  • God is omnibenevolent.
  • Evil exists.

See Problem of evil for further discussion.


  • "All you need to do to get into Heaven is to accept Jesus" (or some other set of criteria).
  • "No one knows how God decides who is saved."

The first claim is useful when trying to convert someone. The second is useful as an answer to questions like "if an evil person repented on their deathbed, would they get into Heaven?" But they are mutually-contradictory, since it is not possible to both know and not know what criteria God uses to judge people.


  • "God wants what is best for us."
  • "God's ways are mysterious, and he cannot be judged."


  • "God doesn't want to give convincing evidence of his existence, because that would take away our free will."
  • "Evidence for God is all around us, including miracles and the complexity of the universe."


  • "It is better to believe on faith alone than through evidence." (See Doubting Thomas.)
  • "This miraculous apparition proves that God is real."

External sites